Peer Feedback from group P2-32

1) Close ups and medium shots. Close up of dead girl - effective because shocking.

2) Mad World soundtrack. It fitted well with the visuals - Lyrics worked well and gave it an atmosphere

Peer Feedback from group P2-34

1) A variety of establishing shots, close ups and mid shots. Showing the facial expressions and other detail. This was effective as it portrayed continuity and flowed really well.

2) Soundtrack of Mad World by Gary Jules. No diegetic sound which gave it mystery and an emotional feel towards the character and shows the genre very well.

3) You couldn't see the character's face, making it a mystery and keeping the audience at the edge of their seats.

4) The use of masking showed the character in a lot of different situations. Including masking over close ups and mid shots.

5) Too much masking, scenes dragged on for too long.

6) Editing - masking was extremely effective. It was eye catching and brought the audience's attention in.

P2-31 Class Feedback Group 33

1) stationry camera throughout, medium shot. Yes it is effective because it allowed to show the effectiveness of overlay shots.

2) The sound used 'Mad World'. Yes it does fit with the visuals because it was trippy. Non-diegetic sound used.

3) Paper/pictures/writing on the walls surrounding the character. Location unknown, adding to the wonderment and eerie atmosphire. Conventions of a thriller.

4) Overlay, black and white. transition - fuzzy.

5) Narrative hard to understand.

6) The overlay effective.

P2-31 Class Feedback Questions

1) Describe the type of camerawork which has been used. Do you think it was effective? Why?

2) What type of sound has been used? Does it work with the visuals? How?

3) How has the mise-en-scene been constructed? Does it have an impact on the thriller genre?

4) What editing techniques have been used?

5) Can you think of any constructive criticisms?

6) What was the most effective element of the production?

Shot list

The shot used here is a medium shot.

 The shot used here is a Close Up













The shot used here is a medium two shot

The shot used here is a medium shot

The shot used here is a medium shot

The shot used here is a medium two shot

The shot used here is a close up

The shot used here is a lower medium close up

The shot used here is a medium shot

The shot used here is a low angle medium close up

The shot used here is a close up

The shot used here is a medium shot

The shot used here is a side close up

The shot used here is a medium shot

The shot used here is a close up

The shot used here is a side close up

The shot used here is a medium shot

12-P2 31 How and Why it is Different to our Storyboard?

We filmed some of our scenes different to how we planned to our storyboard, because once we came to filming our project we felt that some of the shots we used on our storyboard were more difficult to shoot than we thought they would be. We also changed some scenes because we felt that they were not necessary to the sequence. Another factor that affected the outcome of our prodouction, was the two minute limit for our opening sequence, the reason we cut scenes was to allow us to fit the more important clips into the production.

By Joe, Tom, Lily, Esther and Laura

distribution and exhibition

We feel a distributor such as lionsgate would suit our production well, it has a history of thriller films and productions and is highly well known in the world of film this should ensure our production reaches a mass audience, this could be because fans of existing lionsgate films will be interested in seeing similar productions, examples of there distributed works include, the saw series And my bloody Valentine

Joe, esther, Laura, tom, lily